Hello Semir Osmanagic,
I've watched your discovery for quite sometime now and I honestly think you've found something. I do believe that civilization on this planet is much, much older than the general public is lead to believe. That in fact it is so old that architectures and artifacts have eroded so much so that they are almost indistinguishable from ordinary geological formations such as mountains and rocks.
My question is why are your pyramids covered in so much dirt? I have a hypothesis that it is related to global flood that covered world before the last global iceage actually perpetuating the creation of the iceage especially in the Northern hemisphere if it was in the midst of winter season. This flood left huge amounts of sediment. You should keep an eye open for fossilized ocean sea life in the sediment covering the pyramid. This flood also is the reason history was forgotten because most of this ancient civilization died from it leaving very few who knew anything at all about the true past.
Now I'm not an archeologist but I know alot about it and it is one of my passions. My true calling is physics. I believe, just as you believe, I have discovered something of great importance and I wish to share it with you in order to gain some support from another fellow "fringe" (subjective term) scientist. Many in the scientific community have acknowledged that what I've found is "interesting" and the numbers definitely warrant further analysis but so far no one is willing to publish it even though several editors have said that "it is a shame they are unable to publish it". The reason why is simple. It requires a huge rewrite of the current paradigm which is not my intention. But it all comes down to who can talk loudest and be heard. The current scientific community wollow in fear of being ostracised for accpeting or suggesting anything that might go against the current paradigm or sound wacky, but if it gets published in a non journal and gets a bit of a following only then they might consider it in a formal journal even if the mass is so simple. It's all a subjective farce of fear.
In your case, I would say that your discovery is huge and so big in fact that of course other professionals would be jealous. Jealousy is not scietific. Emotion is not scientific. It is the trait of the ignorant. These "jealous" people are missing a great opportunity to be involved in the greatest historical discovery ever made by wollowing in their "fear" and "jealousy".
In my case, there are enough theories in the current paradigm of physics that are truely works of imagination and not true science. Mine is not one of them but String Theory and the Big Bang Theory are. String Theory has been around for 40s with no ability to be tested, verified and holds no predictions. It's not a science theory at all, it's an imaginary farce. Now I'm not a "fringe" scientist in the traditional sense. I'm actually a critic and I have a hard time accepting imaginary works of fiction especially those accepted by the scientific community based on unscientific methods of reasoning at any level. I am a proponent of relativity and that everything is relative to eachother. Any physics theory that misses that obvious fact and starts making things up that are unrelated to anything else (such as String Theory in it's attempt to "patch" physics together) flags my attention and my rath of critism.
The Big Bang is another work that holds more merit than String Theory in it's reasoning but it has twp foundamental flaws. It assumes that the Universe is expanding because it exploded in the very beginning. That's an assumption not science. The second assumption is that all we can see in the Universe is actually the whole or majority of the Universe. We have no idea how big the Universe is at all which leads to the first assumption. Is it just our percievable part of the Universe that is expanding? The Big Bang Theory has foundamental flaws but again it is masterpiece compared to imaginary art work of String Theory. Anyway, below is my work and I hope you enjoy it.
-Robert DeMelo
